NGT Ruling Upholds Environmental Justice in Mumbai Redevelopment- Advocate Aditya Pratap represented the Complainants seeking a rigorous Appraisal Process:

Environmental Law Environment Clearances for Projects

Posted by Aditya Pratap Law Offices on 19 Jul 24

---

In an era where urban development often clashes with environmental sustainability, the case stands out as a beacon of justice and regulatory adherence. This landmark ruling by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) not only underscores the importance of environmental laws but also highlights the crucial role of skilled legal advocacy. 

The backdrop of this case is the bustling city of Mumbai, specifically the redevelopment of the 'Oriana Residential Project' in Bandra East. M/s Resilience Realty Pvt. Ltd., the project proponent, sought to expand their development, increasing the built-up area from 32,395 sq.m to 40,480 sq.m. This expansion, however, was contested by the complainant, who argued that the environmental clearance (EC) granted for this expansion was in blatant violation of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006.

 

The contention was based on the fact that the expansion was approved without a proper appraisal by the State-Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC). Instead, the State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) treated it merely as an amendment to the existing EC, bypassing the necessary environmental scrutiny.

The Legal Battle

Enter Aditya Pratap, the adept advocate representing the Complainant. Pratap meticulously argued that the EC granted on March 13, 2014, should have undergone a rigorous appraisal process. He emphasized that the significant increase in the built-up area necessitated a fresh environmental impact assessment to ensure compliance with the EIA Notification, 2006. Pratap's arguments underscored the potential environmental ramifications of the expansion, which had been overlooked due to procedural lapses.

On the other side, the respondents, including M/s Resilience Realty Pvt. Ltd. and the State authorities, defended the amendment, arguing that the changes were minimal and environmentally insignificant. They maintained that the existing EC was sufficient to cover the expansion.

The Verdict: NGT's Ruling

The National Green Tribunal, after a thorough examination of the arguments and evidence, delivered a verdict that resonated with environmental activists and legal experts alike. The NGT ruled that the EC granted for the project's expansion was indeed in violation of the EIA Notification, 2006. The Tribunal highlighted that the significant increase in the built-up area required a fresh appraisal by the SEAC.

The NGT set aside the EC granted on March 13, 2014, and directed the SEAC to conduct a comprehensive environmental impact assessment of the project. This ruling was a significant victory and a stern reminder to developers and regulatory authorities about the importance of adhering to environmental laws.

The Impact and Implications

The ruling is a landmark decision that reinforces the need for stringent environmental scrutiny in urban development projects. It sends a clear message that any expansion in construction projects must undergo thorough environmental impact assessments to ensure sustainable development. The decision is a triumph for environmental justice and sets a precedent for future cases where environmental laws may be compromised for urban development.

Aditya Pratap's role in this case was exemplary. His deep understanding of environmental regulations and his ability to effectively communicate the legal violations were instrumental in securing this victory. This case highlights the importance of skilled legal advocacy in protecting environmental interests and ensuring that development does not come at the cost of ecological sustainability.

A Beacon of Environmental Justice

The case is a testament to the power of legal advocacy in upholding environmental laws. It showcases how determined individuals, supported by proficient legal teams, can challenge procedural lapses and ensure that urban development projects adhere to environmental norms. This ruling is not just a victory for the party involved but for all those who believe in the importance of sustainable development and environmental justice.